Compton, Elbert v. Martin, Robert et al
Elbert R. Compton |
Robert Martin, Anthony M. Hentz, Tiffany Anderson, Tammy Maassen, Lizzie Tisdel and Lily H. Liu |
WSPF Prison Facility |
3:2023cv00250 |
April 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Madison Office |
Stephen L Crocker |
James D Peterson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Initial Order for Paid Pro Se: Plaintiff's complaint taken under advisement. Plaintiff's Motion for Use of Release Account Funds (dkt. #3 ) denied as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew R. Wiseman on 5/16/2023. (lam),(ps) |
PLRA Screening. (lam),(ps) |
Filing 4 Disregard. (lam),(ps) |
Filing fee received: $402.00, receipt number 1020. (lam),(ps) |
Filing 3 Motion for Use of Release Account Funds by Plaintiff Elbert R. Compton. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (lam),(ps) |
Filing 2 ORDER that plaintiff Elbert R. Compton to submit $402 filing fee or IFP motion along with Trust Fund Account Statement by 5/12/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 4/21/2023. (nln),(ps) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Elbert R. Compton. (Case non-randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson.) (Attachments: #1 Notice of Claim) (nln),(ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.