Ledford, William v. Ribault, Justin et al
| William N. Ledford |
| Dr. Justin S. Ribault, Dr. Daniel Lavoie, Dr. Gina Bouno, RN Holly Gunderson, RN Jaime Lee Adams and RN Sheryl Kinyon |
| CCI Prison Facility |
| 3:2023cv00310 |
| May 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| James D Peterson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
** TEXT ONLY ORDER **Plaintiff has not paid the $402 filing fee by the deadline I set in my June 2 order. See Dkt. 8 . So as I instructed in that order, I will consider plaintiff to have voluntarily withdrawn the lawsuit. This case is DISMISSED. Plaintiff's obligation to pay the filing fee is waived. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 6/20/2023. (lam),(ps)
|
|
Filing 8
** TEXT ONLY ORDER **Plaintiff has filed a motion for reconsideration of Magistrate Judge Wiseman's order denying him in forma pauperis status. Dkt. #6 . Rather than have the magistrate issue a second order for which plaintiff could seek my review, I will address the motion now and deny it. The court must follow the fee provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1915, under which plaintiff does not qualify for in forma pauperis status because of the large sum in his account in the months before he filed the lawsuit. The fact that he has spent much of that amount on canteen and other purchases and can no longer pay the full $402 fee out of his regular account is not a reason to reconsider the court's decision. If plaintiff fails to pay the fee by the June 6 deadline previously set, the court will consider him to have voluntarily withdrawn the lawsuit, and he won't owe the filing fee for it. If he refiles the case later, the court will reconsider his request for in forma pauperis status based on his account information for the six months preceding his new complaint. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 6/2/2023. (lam),(ps)
|
| Filing 7 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision (Objection) to District Court by Plaintiff William N. Ledford re #5 Order on ifp request. (jat),(ps) |
| Filing 6 Motion for Reconsideration re #5 Order on ifp request by Plaintiff William N. Ledford. (jat),(ps) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff William N. Ledford's motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee, dkt. #2 is DENIED; plaintiff's motion for use of release account funds, dkt. #3 , is DENIED as moot; plaintiff may have until 6/6/23 to pay $402 filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew R. Wiseman on 5/16/2023. (nln),(ps)
|
| Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Plaintiff William N. Ledford. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (nln),(ps) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/15/2023: #2 IFP Determination) (nln). |
| Filing 3 Motion for Use of Release Account Funds by Plaintiff William N. Ledford. (nln),(ps) |
| Filing 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff William N. Ledford. (nln),(ps) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by William N. Ledford. (Case non-randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - ED Provider Notes, #2 Exhibit 2 - Correspondence, #3 Exhibit 3 - Correspondence from HSAM Kinyon, #4 Exhibit 4 - Correspondence re Harassment Complaint, #5 Exhibit 5 - Health Service Request, #6 Exhibit 6 - Progress Notes, #7 Exhibit 7 - Plan of Care for Mr. William Ledford) (nln),(ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
