Tarhan, Mehmet et al v. Mayorkas, Alejandro et al
| Mehmet Tarhan and Fatima Essaidi |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou, Connie Nolan and Michael Valverde |
| 3:2023cv00408 |
| June 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| William M Conley |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Ur M Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Connie Nolan, Michael Valverde. (lak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ur M Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Connie Nolan, Michael Valverde. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AWIWDC-3261888.), filed by Mehmet Tarhan, Fatima Essaidi. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Marriage Certificate, #2 Exhibit B. USCIS Receipt Notice, #3 Exhibit C. Inquiry, #4 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons - US Attorney, #6 Summons - Garland, #7 Summons - Jaddou, #8 Summons - Mayorkas, #9 Summons - Nolan, #10 Summons - Valverde) (Lotfi, Shabnam) Modified on 6/20/2023. (lak) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (lak) |
| Standard attachments for Judge William M. Conley required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
