Lush, Stephen v. Crawford, Susan
Plaintiff: Stephen Lush
Defendant: Susan M. Crawford, Frank D. Remington and J. Alberto Quiroga
Case Number: 3:2023cv00538
Filed: August 7, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: William M Conley
Referring Judge: Stephen L Crocker
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER from USCA dismissing appeal as to appellees Frank D. Remington and J. Alberto Quiroga as to #25 Notice of Appeal, filed by Stephen Lush (acd),(ps)
September 1, 2023 Filing 31 JUDGMENT entered in favor of Defendants Susan M. Crawford, J. Alberto Quiroga, Frank D. Remington dismissing the case. (jef),(ps)
August 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER re: Case Nos. 23-cv-380-wmc, 23-cv-443-wmc, 23-cv-537-wmc, 23-cv-538-wmc, 23-cv-539-wmc, 23-cv-556-wmc and 23-cv-557-wmc. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 8/31/2023. (nln),(ps)
August 31, 2023 Filing 29 MOTION TO DISMISS Def. Frank D. Remington With Prejudice by Plaintiff Stephen Lush. (Lush, Stephen),(ps)
August 30, 2023 Filing 28 Docketing Statement re #25 Notice of Appeal,. (Lush, Stephen),(ps)
August 30, 2023 Filing 27 Transmission of Notice of Appeal, Docketing Statement, Dkt. #17 - Order, Dkt. #22- Order and Docket Sheet to Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals re #25 Notice of Appeal, (Attachments: #1 Docketing Statement, #2 Dkt. #17 - Order, #3 Dkt. #22- Order, #4 Docket Sheet) (voc),(ps)
August 30, 2023 Filing 26 Appeal Information Packet. (voc),(ps)
August 30, 2023 USCA Case Number 23-2715 for #25 Notice of Appeal, filed by Stephen Lush. (acd),(ps)
August 29, 2023 Filing 25 NOTICE OF APPEAL - INTERLOCUTORY by Plaintiff Stephen Lush as to #17 Order,,,,,,, 22 Text Only Order,,,,. IFP previously granted. Docketing Statement filed. (Attachments: #1 Docketing Statement Plaintiff, Stephen Lush's Docketing Statement) (Lush, Stephen),(ps)
August 28, 2023 Filing 24 MOTION TO DISMISS Def. J. Alberto Quiroga W/Prejudice by Plaintiff Stephen Lush. (Lush, Stephen),(ps)
August 25, 2023 Filing 23 MOTION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION by Plaintiff Stephen Lush. (acd),(ps)
August 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **Because of a flurry of duplicative and seemingly frivolous (at least in substantial part) filings clogging its docket, the court entered an order on August 21, 2023, directing further submissions from plaintiff Stephen Lush in Case Nos. 23-cv-503-wmc, 23-cv-510-wmc, 23-cv-537-wmc, 23-cv-538-wmc, and 23-cv-539-wmc, to be set aside until a screening order is issued as required by 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Since then Mr. Lush has resorted to sending communications to the Clerk of Court seeking relief in one or more of his cases that only the court can grant. Although they will not be considered until screening is completed, the Clerk of Court shall: docket all such communications received since August 21, 2023, and all future communications, in the corresponding case; or if no case number is referenced, docket such communications in miscellaneous Case No. 23-mc-1000. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 8/25/2023. (nln),(ps)
August 24, 2023 Filing 21 Request for Waiver of Service sent to Def. J. Alberto Quiroga on August 18, 2023 by Plaintiff Stephen Lush. Waiver of Service due 9/18/2023. (Lush, Stephen),(ps)
August 24, 2023 Filing 20 Request for Waiver of Service sent to Frank D. Remington on August 18, 2023 by Plaintiff Stephen Lush. Waiver of Service due 9/18/2023. (Lush, Stephen),(ps)
August 24, 2023 Filing 19 MOTION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION Against Def. Frank D. Remington by Plaintiff Stephen Lush. (Lush, Stephen),(ps)
August 23, 2023 Filing 18 Letter from Plaintiff Stephen Lush. (Attachments: #1 Bishop v. United States, 223 F.2d 582, 96 U.S. App. D.C. 117 (D.C. Cir. 1955), #2 Envelope) (nln),(ps)
August 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER Plaintiff Stephen Lush is DIRECTED to stop submitting new complaints and exhibits in his cases under advisement for screening as required by 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). The court will not consider any further submissions from Lush in Case Nos. 23-cv-503-wmc, 23-cv-510-wmc, 23-cv-537-wmc, 23-cv-538-wmc, or 23-cv-539-wmc, until the court has entered its order screening the most recent pleading. Any future submissions from Lush containing uncivil or disrespectful language will be stricken, and Lush will be subject to sanctions up to and including dismissal of his cases with prejudice and a filing restriction. Lush's request for leave to take an interlocutory appeal in Case No. 23-cv-537-wmc (dkt. #21) is DENIED. The court CERTIFIES that Lush's appeal is not taken in good faith for purposes of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3) and DENIES Lush leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in Case No. 23-cv-537-wmc. Although this court has certified that Lush's appeal is not taken in good faith under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3), Lush is advised that he may challenge this finding pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(5) by filing a separate motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal with the Clerk of Court, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. With that motion, he must include an affidavit as described in the first paragraph of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a), along with (1) a statement of issues he intends to argue on appeal and (2) a copy of this order. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 8/21/2023. (rks),(ps)
August 17, 2023 Filing 16 Exhibit to #6 Amended Complaint filed by Stephen Lush N. Ill. Univ. College of Law Transcript (Lush, Stephen),(ps)
August 17, 2023 Filing 15 Exhibit to #6 Amended Complaint filed by Stephen Lush Lush v. Stibick, Third Amended Complaint (Lush, Stephen),(ps)
August 17, 2023 Filing 14 Exhibit to #6 Amended Complaint filed by Stephen Lush Lush v. Stibick, Amended Complaint (Lush, Stephen),(ps)
August 17, 2023 Filing 13 Exhibit to #6 Amended Complaint filed by Stephen Lush Lush v. Stibick, Second Amended Complaint (Lush, Stephen),(ps)
August 17, 2023 Filing 12 Exhibit to #6 Amended Complaint filed by Stephen Lush S&C Lush v. Stibick (Sealed Document) (Lush, Stephen),(ps)
August 14, 2023 Filing 11 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Stephen Lush. (Lush, Stephen),(ps)
August 12, 2023 Filing 10 Exhibit to #6 Amended Complaint filed by Stephen Lush Motion for Substitution of Def. Crawford (Lush, Stephen),(ps)
August 12, 2023 Filing 9 Exhibit to #6 Amended Complaint filed by Stephen Lush Brief Over Sum of $400 Against Ms. Schwarz Regarding Def. Crawford (Lush, Stephen),(ps)
August 12, 2023 Filing 8 Demand for Trial by Jury by Plaintiff Stephen Lush (Lush, Stephen),(ps)
August 12, 2023 Filing 7 Civil Cover Sheet by Plaintiff Stephen Lush. (Lush, Stephen),(ps) Modified on 8/14/2023: modified docket text to match document filed. (nln).
August 11, 2023 Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT Unsealed against Susan M. Crawford, J. Alberto Quiroga, Frank D. Remington, filed by Stephen Lush. (Lush, Stephen),(ps)
August 11, 2023 Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Susan M. Crawford, Frank D. Remington, J. Alberto Quiroga (Sealed Document), filed by Stephen Lush. (Lush, Stephen),(ps)
August 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff Stephen Lush's petition for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees is GRANTED. Complaint taken under advisement for screening. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew R. Wiseman on 8/09/2023. (nln),(ps)
August 8, 2023 Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Susan M. Crawford., filed by Stephen Lush. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit MPD Noise Complaint, #2 Exhibit HIPAA Claim Elaborated, #3 Exhibit Mtn for Default Judgment on HIPAA Claim, #4 Exhibit Affidavit of Mailing for HIPAA Claim, #5 Exhibit Proof of Publication HIPAA Claim, #6 Exhibit Refused Admission of Service by Dr. Greenspan's Receptionist, #7 Exhibit List of Unresolved MPD Reports, #8 Exhibit Objection to Removal by U.S. Attorney) (Lush, Stephen),(ps)
August 7, 2023 Filing 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Stephen Lush. (nln),(ps)
August 7, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Susan M. Crawford, filed by Stephen Lush. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter and Envelope) (nln),(ps)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lush, Stephen v. Crawford, Susan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephen Lush
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Susan M. Crawford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Frank D. Remington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Alberto Quiroga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?