Kukler-Kahn, Vaughan et al v. Blinken, Antony
| VAUGHAN R. KUKLER-KHAN and MUHAMMAD AJMAL KHAN |
| Antony J. Blinken |
| 3:2023cv00601 |
| August 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| William M Conley |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Proof of Service, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Service to Blinken, #2 Exhibit B - Service to Garland, #3 Exhibit C - Service to US Attorney) (Morrison, Curtis) Modified on 10/2/2023. (lak) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. (lak) |
| Standard attachments for Judge William M. Conley required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (lak) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (lak) |
| Filing 1 Motion for Writ of Mandamus for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AWIWDC-3298590.), filed by Plaintiffs, (Attachments: #1 221(g) notice, #2 CEAC status, #3 Summons US Attorney, #4 Summons Blinken, #5 Summons Garland, #6 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet) (Morrison, Curtis) Modified on 8/31/2023: E-mail sent to counsel. Counsel to call clerk's office for instructions. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
