Fletcher, James v. Homesite Insurance Company
| Fletcher James and James Fletcher |
| Homesite Insurance Company |
| 3:2023cv00624 |
| September 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| James D Peterson |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Notice of Appearance filed by Erik D. Peterson for Plaintiff James Fletcher. (Peterson, Erik) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by James Brandon McWherter for Plaintiff James Fletcher. (McWherter, James) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Homesite Insurance Company. (lak) |
| Standard attachments for Judge James D. Peterson required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (lak) |
| Case non-randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Civil cover sheet indicates related case 20cv1002. (lak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Homesite Insurance Company. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AWIWDC-3302987.), filed by James Fletcher, (Attachments: #1 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Snodgrass, Thomas) Modified on 9/11/2023: Changed plaintiff's name from Fletcher James to James Fletcher. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
