Kraemer Brothers, LLC v. CMR Construction & Roofing of Texas, LLC
Kraemer Brothers, LLC |
CMR Construction & Roofing of Texas, LLC and CMR Construction & Roofing, LLC |
3:2023cv00703 |
October 12, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Stephen L Crocker |
James D Peterson |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ANSWER to Amended Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Defendants CMR Construction & Roofing of Texas, LLC, CMR Construction & Roofing, LLC. (Van Schyndle, Eric) Modified on 12/5/2023. (lak) |
Filing 11 Pretrial Conference Order - # Preliminary Pretrial Packet in cases assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson attached. Amendments to Pleadings due 2/28/2024. Dispositive Motions due 10/4/2024. Settlement Letters due 1/10/2025. Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures and Motions in Limine due 1/31/2025. Responses due 2/14/2025. First Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/26/2025 at 02:30 PM. Second Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/5/2025 at 02:30 PM. Jury Selection and Trial set for 3/10/2025 at 09:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 11/28/2023. (lam) |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker: Telephone Preliminary Pretrial Conference held on 11/28/2023 [:10] (cak) |
Filing 10 Joint Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (Baumbach, Devon) |
Filing 9 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER accepting #8 Stipulation Regarding Defendants' Acceptance of Service and Deadline to Answer Amended Complaint, extension granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 11/20/2023. (rks) |
Filing 8 Stipulation Regarding Defendants' Acceptance of Service and Deadline to Answer Amended Complaint by Defendants CMR Construction & Roofing of Texas, LLC, CMR Construction & Roofing, LLC. (Alexejun, Stacy) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued. (lak) |
Filing 6 (Summons and) AMENDED COMPLAINT against CMR Construction & Roofing of Texas, LLC, CMR Construction & Roofing, LLC, filed by Kraemer Brothers, LLC. (Baumbach, Devon) Modified on 11/13/2023. (lak) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff Kraemer Brothers, LLC. (Baumbach, Devon) |
Filing 4 Notice of Appearance filed by Devon R. Baumbach for Plaintiff Kraemer Brothers, LLC. (Baumbach, Devon) |
Set Telephone Pretrial or Status Conference: Telephone Pretrial Conference set for 11/28/2023 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Counsel for Plaintiff responsible for setting up the call to chambers at (608) 264-5153. [#Standing Order Governing Preliminary Pretrial Conference attached] (rks) |
Filing 3 Answer to Complaint (Notice of Removal) and Affirmative Defenses by Defendant CMR Construction & Roofing of Texas, LLC. (Alexejun, Stacy) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant CMR Construction & Roofing of Texas, LLC. (Alexejun, Stacy) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Sauk County Circuit Court, case number 2023CV000344. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 018507), filed by CMR Construction & Roofing of Texas, LLC. (Attachments: #1 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit - Summons and Complaint and Exhibits) (Alexejun, Stacy) Modified on 10/13/2023. (lak) |
Case randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (lak) |
Standard attachments for Judge James D. Peterson: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.