Evangelista, Wayne v. Crocker, Stephen et al
| Wayne Richard Evangelista and Wayne R. Nance, Jr. |
| Stephen L. Crocker, Kim V. Gaffney, Kalvin D. Barrett, Shunta Lewis, Francisca Estrada, M.D., Brian Hayes, Heidi Gardner, Krystle Topp and Michael J. Licitis |
| 3:2023cv00802 |
| November 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| William M Conley |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re Civil case terminated for plaintiff's failure to pay initial partial filing fee. Not in custody at Dane County Jail. Not resent as NEF was also sent to Fitchburg address. (acd),(ps) |
| Civil case terminated for plaintiff's failure to pay filing fee or submit motion to proceed in forma pauperis and trust fund account statement. (acd),(ps) |
Filing 2
ORDER directing Plaintiff to submit $402 filing fee or a motion leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee and a Trust Fund Account Statement by 12/12/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew R. Wiseman on 11/20/2023. (jef),(ps)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Wayne Richard Evangelista. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jef),(ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
