Murray, David v. UMR, Inc.
David J. Murray |
UMR, Inc. |
3:2023cv00813 |
November 22, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Stephen L Crocker |
James D Peterson |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER ** The December 21, 2023 telephonic pretrial conference morphed into a status conference based on the parties' report of new information that may change the nature and direction of this lawsuit. Here's where we landed: briefing on defendant's motion to dismiss is stayed. Not later than March 20, 2024, the parties must submit a joint letter reporting where they find themselves and how they suggest this case move forward. We will reconvene for a telephonic status conference on March 22, 2024 at 1:00 p.m. to get this case back on track toward resolution. The parties had no other matters to bring to the court's attention. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 12/21/2023. (lam) |
Filing 7 Joint Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (Anderson, Kadee) |
Telephone Pretrial Conference set for 12/21/2023 at 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Counsel for Plaintiff responsible for setting up the call to chambers at (608) 264-5153. [#Standing Order Governing Preliminary Pretrial Conference attached] (lam) |
Filing 6 Brief in Support of #4 Motion to Dismiss by Defendant UMR, Inc. (Anderson, Kadee) |
Filing 5 Declaration of Nicole Busche filed by Defendant UMR, Inc. re: #4 Motion to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Health Benefit Summary Plan) (Anderson, Kadee) Modified on 11/29/2023. (lak) |
Filing 4 MOTION TO DISMISS by Defendant UMR, Inc.. Brief in Opposition due 12/20/2023. Brief in Reply due 1/2/2024. (Anderson, Kadee) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant UMR, Inc.. (Anderson, Kadee) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Service by Defendant UMR, Inc. as to #1 Notice of Removal,. (Anderson, Kadee) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Wood County Circuit Court, case number 2023CV000410. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AWIWDC-3340403), filed by UMR, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Documents filed with the State Court, #2 Exhibit 2 - SPD for the Plan, #3 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet) (Anderson, Kadee) Modified on 11/22/2023. (lak) |
Standard attachments for Judge James D. Peterson: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (lak) |
Case randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Murray, David v. UMR, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: David J. Murray | |
Represented By: | Michael J. Schmidt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: UMR, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Kadee Jo Anderson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.