Pfalzgraf, Brian v. Rusk County et al
Plaintiff: Brian Pfalzgraf
Defendant: Rusk County and Ben Reisner
Case Number: 3:2023cv00877
Filed: December 20, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: Stephen L Crocker
Referring Judge: James D Peterson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 16, 2024 Filing 8 Joint Preliminary Pretrial Conference Report by Defendants Ben Reisner, Rusk County (Sacks, Jonathan)
January 22, 2024 Set Telephone Pretrial or Status Conference: Telephone Pretrial Conference set for 2/27/2024 at 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Counsel for Plaintiff responsible for setting up the call to chambers at (608) 264-5153. [#Standing Order Governing Preliminary Pretrial Conference attached] (jls)
January 19, 2024 Filing 7 ANSWER by Defendants Ben Reisner, Rusk County. (Stadler, Ronald)
January 19, 2024 Filing 6 Notice of Appearance filed by Ronald S. Stadler for Defendants Ben Reisner, Rusk County. (Stadler, Ronald)
January 19, 2024 Filing 5 Notice of Appearance filed by Jonathan Edward Sacks for Defendants Ben Reisner, Rusk County. (Sacks, Jonathan)
January 8, 2024 Filing 4 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Defendants Ben Reisner, Rusk County. All Defendants. (Resch, Randal)
December 27, 2023 Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by Randal Richard Resch, Jr for Plaintiff Brian Pfalzgraf. (Resch, Randal)
December 27, 2023 Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by John H. Bradley for Plaintiff Brian Pfalzgraf. (Bradley, John)
December 20, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AWIWDC-3352884.), filed by Brian Pfalzgraf (Attachments: #1 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet) (Odell, James) Modified on 12/20/2023. (lak)
December 20, 2023 Case randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (lak)
December 20, 2023 Standard attachments for Judge James D. Peterson required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (lak)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pfalzgraf, Brian v. Rusk County et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Pfalzgraf
Represented By: James Odell
Represented By: John H. Bradley
Represented By: Randal Richard Resch, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rusk County
Represented By: Ronald S. Stadler
Represented By: Jonathan Edward Sacks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ben Reisner
Represented By: Ronald S. Stadler
Represented By: Jonathan Edward Sacks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?