BMO Bank N.A. v. Terri Durand Trucking Inc. et al
| BMO Bank N.A. and BMO Harris Bank N.A. |
| Terri Durand Trucking Inc., Terri Durand, Badger State Recovery, Inc. and BSR Transport, Inc. |
| 3:2023cv00879 |
| December 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| William M Conley |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Address) (lak) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff BMO Bank N.A.. (Haney, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BSR Transport, Inc., Badger State Recovery, Inc., Terri Durand, Terri Durand Trucking Inc.. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AWIWDC-3353517.), filed by BMO Bank N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Loan and Security Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Continuing Guaranties, #3 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons as to Terri Durand Trucking Inc., #5 Summons as to Terri Durand, #6 Summons as to Badger State Recovery, Inc., #7 Summons as to BSR Transport, Inc.) (Haney, James) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (lak) |
| Standard attachments for Judge William M. Conley required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
