Smith, Tamas v. Carr, Kevin et al
| Tamas R. Smith |
| Kevin Carr, Dr. Emmanual O. Odeyemi, Dr. Craig D. Destree, John Doe #1, Larry W. Fuchs, Ryan M. Blount, Kevin W. Pitzen, Eric H. Peters, Rebecca Garner and Natasha Radtke |
| CCI Prison Facility |
| 3:2023cv00888 |
| December 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| William M Conley |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Warden PLRA Letter. (voc),(ps) |
| Partial Filing fee received : $ 7.58, receipt number 2173.(voc),(ps) |
Filing 4
ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 7.58 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 1/25/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew R. Wiseman on 12/28/2023. (jef),(ps)
|
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Plaintiff Tamas R. Smith. (jef),(ps) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/28/2023: #1 IPP Calculation) (jef). |
| Filing 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Tamas R. Smith. (jef),(ps) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Tamas R. Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Lab report, #2 Exhibit 2 - Order to pay institution restitution, #3 Exhibit 3 - Progress Note, #4 Exhibit 4 - Discharge Summary, #5 Cover Letter) (jef),(ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
