Craig, Eugene v. LendingTree, LLC
| Eugene Craig |
| LendingTree, LLC |
| 3:2023cv00891 |
| December 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| William M Conley |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Pretrial Conference Order - # Preliminary Pretrial Packet in cases assigned to District Judge William M. Conley attached. Amendments to Pleadings due 3/15/2024. Dispositive Motions due 11/8/2024. Settlement Letters due 2/28/2025. Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures and Motions in Limine due 3/7/2025. Responses due 3/21/2025. First Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/1/2025 at 02:30 PM. Second Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/8/2025 at 02:30 PM. Jury Selection and Trial set for 4/14/2025 at 09:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 2/21/2024. (rks)
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker: Telephone Preliminary Pretrial Conference held on 2/20/2024 [:15] (cak) |
| Filing 9 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (Crandall, Eric) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant LendingTree, LLC. (Wuest, Matthew) |
| Set Telephone Pretrial or Status Conference: Telephone Pretrial Conference set for 2/20/2024 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Counsel for Plaintiff responsible for setting up the call to chambers at (608) 264-5153. [#Standing Order Governing Preliminary Pretrial Conference attached] (rks) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER by Defendant LendingTree, LLC. (Wuest, Matthew) Modified on 1/16/2024: Second e-mail sent to counsel to file defendant's corporate disclosure statement. (lak) |
| Filing 6 Declaration of Matthew M. Wuest in Response to Plaintiff's Declaration (ECF 5) (Wuest, Matthew) |
| Disregard, incorrect case. (jat). |
| Filing 5 Declaration of Eric L. Crandall filed by Plaintiff Eugene Craig re: 4 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer,,, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Oct. 27, 2023 invest letter to LendingTree, #2 Exhibit Nov. 8 e-mail exchange with op-counsel, #3 Exhibit State court docket - Craig v. lendingTree, no. 2023-CV-621 (Eau Claire Co., WI), #4 Exhibit Dec. 19, 2023 e-mail exchange with op-counsel, #5 Exhibit Dec. 26, 2023 e-mail exchange with op-counsel, #6 Exhibit E-mails and stip from other cases showing similar extensions, #7 Exhibit e-mail to counsel in other case denying excessive extension b/c it was not fair to other litigants, #8 Exhibit draft stip and order from LendgTree counsel styled for wrong court, #9 Exhibit Dec. 28, 2023 e-mail and draft stip and order in state court case) (Crandall, Eric) |
|
Filing 4
** TEXT ONLY ORDER **Defendant's motion for an extension of time to answer or otherwise response is GRANTED without the need for a response. The new deadline is January 12, 2024. It is FURTHER ORDERED that not later than January 5, 2024, plaintiff, by counsel, shall respond to defendant's report of its unsuccessful attempts to obtain plaintiff's agreement to a short front-end deadline extension, with defendant's reply due by January 12, 2024. As counsel both are well aware, this court requires attorneys to treat each other with courtesy and consideration, and to reasonably accommodate each other in all matters. Failure to do so shall have consequences. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 12/29/2023. (jls)
|
| Filing 3 Declaration of Matthew M. Wuest re #2 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Email Communications between counsel) (Wuest, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint by Defendant LendingTree, LLC. Response due 1/5/2024. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Wuest, Matthew) Modified on 12/29/2023. (lak) |
| Case directly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Related cases 21cv230, 21cv731, 23cv130, 23cv515. (lak) |
| Standard attachments for Judge William M. Conley: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (lak) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Eau Clarie County Circuit Court, case number 2023cv00621. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AWIWDC-3355630), filed by LendingTree, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Documents, #2 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet) (Wuest, Matthew) Modified on 12/29/2023. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Craig, Eugene v. LendingTree, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Eugene Craig | |
| Represented By: | Eric Leighton Crandall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: LendingTree, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Lauri A. Mazzuchetti |
| Represented By: | Matthew M Wuest |
| Represented By: | Theresa M. Correa McMichen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
