St Reproductive Technologies, LLC v. Smaxtec Inc. et al
Plaintiff: St Reproductive Technologies, LLC doing business as Stinsight
Defendant: Smaxtec Inc. and Smaxtec Animal Care Gmbh
Case Number: 3:2024cv00037
Filed: January 18, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: Stephen L Crocker
Referring Judge: James D Peterson
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #13 Motion to Admit George Andrew Lever Rosbrook Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 2/8/2024. (lak)
February 7, 2024 Filing 15 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Defendant Smaxtec Animal Care Gmbh. Smaxtec Animal Care Gmbh waiver sent on 2/2/2024, answer due 4/2/2024. (Moffett, Daniel)
February 7, 2024 Filing 14 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff St Reproductive Technologies, LLC. (Moffett, Daniel)
February 7, 2024 Filing 13 Motion to Admit George Andrew Rosbrook Pro Hac Vice. ( Pro Hac Vice fee $ 100 receipt number AWIWDC-3374264.) by Plaintiff St Reproductive Technologies, LLC. (Rosbrook, George)
February 7, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 2/7/2024. (lam)
February 7, 2024 Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Smaxtec Animal Care Gmbh. (Lessner, Justin)
February 7, 2024 Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Smaxtec Inc.. (Lessner, Justin)
February 7, 2024 Filing 9 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, by Defendant Smaxtec Inc.. (Lessner, Justin)
February 7, 2024 Filing 8 Notice of Appearance filed by Justin Harold Lessner for Defendants Smaxtec Animal Care Gmbh, Smaxtec Inc.. (Lessner, Justin)
January 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #2 Motion to Admit Daniel L. Moffett Pro Hac Vice; granting #3 Motion to Admit Thomas W. Landers, IV Pro Hac Vice; granting #4 Motion to Admit Megan R. Mahoney Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 1/19/2024. (lak)
January 19, 2024 Filing 6 Report on Filing of Patent or Trademark Action. Copy provided to the US Patent and Trademark Office electronically. (lak)
January 19, 2024 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Defendants. (lak)
January 19, 2024 Case randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (lak)
January 19, 2024 Standard attachments for Judge James D. Peterson required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (lak)
January 18, 2024 Filing 4 Motion to Admit Megan Mahoney Pro Hac Vice. ( Pro Hac Vice fee $ 100 receipt number AWIWDC-3364401.) by Plaintiff St Reproductive Technologies, LLC. (Mahoney, Megan) (Main Document 4 replaced on 1/19/2024) (jls).
January 18, 2024 Filing 3 Motion to Admit Thomas Watson Landers, IV Pro Hac Vice. ( Pro Hac Vice fee $ 100 receipt number AWIWDC-3364400.) by Plaintiff St Reproductive Technologies, LLC. (Landers, Thomas) (Main Document 3 replaced on 1/19/2024) (jls).
January 18, 2024 Filing 2 Motion to Admit Daniel L Moffett Pro Hac Vice. ( Pro Hac Vice fee $ 100 receipt number AWIWDC-3364399.) by Plaintiff St Reproductive Technologies, LLC. (Moffett, Daniel) (Main Document 2 replaced on 1/19/2024) (jls).
January 18, 2024 Filing 1 PATENT COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AWIWDC-3364166.) PATENTS AT ISSUE: Patent # 8,823,515, issued 09/02/2014, held by ST Reproductive Technologies, LLC ; Patent # 9,844,206, issued 12/19/2017, held by ST Reproductive Technologies, LLC , filed by St Reproductive Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - '515 Patent, #2 Exhibit B - '206 Patent, #3 Summons - SMAXTEC Animal Care GMBH, #4 Summons - SMAXTEC Inc., #5 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Report on Filing Patent/Trademark Action) (Zylstra, Sarah) Modified on 1/19/2024. (lak)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: St Reproductive Technologies, LLC v. Smaxtec Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: St Reproductive Technologies, LLC doing business as Stinsight
Represented By: Daniel L Moffett
Represented By: Sarah Anne Zylstra
Represented By: Megan Mahoney
Represented By: Thomas Watson Landers, IV
Represented By: George Andrew Rosbrook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Smaxtec Inc.
Represented By: Justin Harold Lessner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Smaxtec Animal Care Gmbh
Represented By: Justin Harold Lessner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?