Kabangu, Neville v. Garland, Merrick et al
| Neville Mbuyamba Kabangu |
| Merrick Garland, Alejandro N. Mayorkas and Ur Mendoza Jaddou |
| 3:2024cv00076 |
| January 31, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| James D Peterson |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Certificate of Service by Plaintiff Neville Mbuyamba Kabangu. (Lee, J. Jae) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Defendants. (lak) |
| Standard attachments for Judge James D. Peterson required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (lak) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (lak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AWIWDC-3371196.), filed by Neville Mbuyamba Kabangu. (Attachments: #1 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Disregard, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons) (Lee, J. Jae) Modified on 2/1/2024. (lak) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/1/2024: #8 Exhibit A - Receipt Notice, #9 Exhibit B - Plaintiff's Passport Biographic Page, #10 Exhibit C - I-94 Records, #11 Exhibit D - Biometrics Notice (stamped), #12 Exhibit E - Interview Notice) (lak). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
