Ash, Davenell v. Superior Police Dept. et al
| Davenell L. Ash |
| Superior Police Dept., Judge Kelly Thimm, Prosecutor Chad Lalor and Officer Todd Carlson |
| 3:2024cv00123 |
| February 27, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| James D Peterson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Notice of filing in the Minnesota District Court by Plaintiff Davenell L. Ash. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Appeal filed in MND Case No. 23-cv-2860-jwb-lib, #2 LESO (1033) Program, #3 Envelope) (jls),(ps) |
Filing 3
ORDER on ifp request: Complaint taken under advisement for screening. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew R. Wiseman on 2/27/2024. (jef),(ps)
|
| Filing 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Davenell L. Ash. (jef),(ps) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Davenell L. Ash. (Attachments: #1 List of Related Cases, #2 Letter from the FBI regarding FOIA request, #3 Letter to the FBI regarding watch list, #4 Letter from the NSA regarding FOIA request, #5 Letter to the NSA regarding FOIA request, #6 Letter to the AO of the US Courts regarding FOIA request, #7 Envelope) (jef),(ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
