Ramirez, Janell v. Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
Janell Ramirez and Janell McCutcheon |
Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston |
3:2024cv00124 |
February 27, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
William M Conley |
Stephen L Crocker |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1362 ERISA |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #4 Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston answer due 5/6/2024. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 4/8/2024. (rks) |
Filing 4 Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer by Plaintiff Janell Ramirez. (Tylka, Brook) |
Filing 3 Affidavit of Service by Plaintiff. Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston served on 3/5/2024, answer due 3/26/2024. (Tylka, Brook) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston. (lak) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AWIWDC-3383794.), filed by Janell Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet) (Tylka, Brook) |
Case randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (lak) |
Standard attachments for Judge William M. Conley required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.