Ozuna v. FCI Oxford, Warden
Petitioner: Carlos P. Ozuna
Respondent: FCI Oxford, Warden
Case Number: 3:2024cv00144
Filed: March 8, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2024 Filing 3 Case transferred in from District of New Hampshire; Case Number 1:24-cv-00042. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. (lak)
February 15, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241. The Clerk's office is directed to transfer this matter to the Western District of Wisconsin, pursuant to 1631. So Ordered by US Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc.(lw) [Transferred from New Hampshire on 3/8/2024.]
February 15, 2024 Civil Case Terminated. (lw) [Transferred from New Hampshire on 3/8/2024.]
February 12, 2024 Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 USC 2241. See also Criminal Case No. 21-cr-35-SM-09 filed by Carlos P. Ozuna. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Attachment)(ed). [Transferred from New Hampshire on 3/8/2024.]
February 12, 2024 NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (ed) [Transferred from New Hampshire on 3/8/2024.]
February 12, 2024 NOTICE of Filing - Case filed under 28 U.S.C. 2241. A copy of the petition has been electronically sent via ECF to your office. No further action is required by the United States Attorney unless directed by the presiding judge.(ed) [Transferred from New Hampshire on 3/8/2024.]
February 12, 2024 Case assigned to Judge Steven J. McAuliffe and US Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc. The case designation is: 1:24-cv-42-SM-TSM. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (ed) [Transferred from New Hampshire on 3/8/2024.]
February 12, 2024 NOTICE - Filing Fee Omitted. Either the $5.00 filing fee or an application to proceed without fees or costs must be submitted within 60 days. If proceeding without prepayment of fees or costs is sought the court needs: Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs, Certificate of Custodial Institution. Compliance Deadline set for 4/12/2024.(ed) [Transferred from New Hampshire on 3/8/2024.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ozuna v. FCI Oxford, Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Carlos P. Ozuna
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: FCI Oxford, Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?