Donahue, Mary v. Group Health Cooperative of South Central Wisconsin
| Mary Donahue |
| Group Health Cooperative of South Central Wisconsin |
| 3:2024cv00316 |
| May 10, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Anita M Boor |
| James D Peterson |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
** TEXT ONLY ORDER **Plaintiffs in each of the seven cases about the GHC data breach move for an extension of time until July 15 to file a motion to remand to state court. That motion is GRANTED. If plaintiffs neither move to remand nor show cause why the cases should not be consolidated by July 15, the court will consolidate the cases and set them for a preliminary pretrial conference. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 6/24/2024. (jls)
|
| Filing 13 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion to Remand by Plaintiff Mary Donahue. (Strauss, Samuel) |
|
Filing 12
** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anita M. Boor on 6/17/2024. (voc)
|
| Filing 11 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer re 10 Text Only Order,,,,,, by Defendant Group Health Cooperative of South Central Wisconsin. (Harris, Jacob) |
|
Filing 10
** TEXT ONLY ORDER **Defendant removed from state court seven proposed class actions about a data breach that occurred in January 2024. The court asked the parties to address multiple issues, and the parties have responded. First the parties waive any right to recusal based on the presiding judge's status as a member of defendant. The court understands that any proposed class definition will exclude the presiding judge, his immediate family, and his law clerks. Second, the parties agree that defendant's amended notice of removal satisfies the "minimal diversity" requirement in 28 U.S.C. 1332(d) by alleging that defendant is a citizen of Wisconsin and its records show that "tens of thousands" of its patients live outside of Wisconsin. That is sufficient to allege minimal diversity, but defendant will need to come forward with evidence to support that allegation before the court can rule on any dispositive motion. See Lujan v. Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n, 497 U.S. 871, 888 (1990). Third, defendant says that consolidation of all seven cases is appropriate; plaintiffs ask the court to stay consideration of consolidation pending a motion to remand to state court, which plaintiffs say they will be filing within the next two weeks. The court will defer a decision on consolidation until June 26. If plaintiffs neither move to remand nor show cause why the cases should not be consolidated by then, the court will consolidate the cases and set the cases for a preliminary pretrial conference. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 6/12/2024. (lam)
|
| Filing 9 Response re: #4 Order, by Defendant Group Health Cooperative of South Central Wisconsin. (Harris, Jacob) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED NOTICE OF REMOVAL , filed by Group Health Cooperative of South Central Wisconsin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Dane County Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - 2024CV001197 Case Details in Dane County) (Harris, Jacob) Modified on 6/5/2024. (lak) |
| Filing 7 Notice of Appearance filed by Joseph S. Diedrich for Defendant Group Health Cooperative of South Central Wisconsin. (Diedrich, Joseph) |
|
Filing 6
** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER accepting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The court accepts the parties' stipulation: Defendant shall answer or otherwise plead in response to the complaint in this action on or before June 17, 2024, or, alternatively, within the statutorily dictated time after any amended complaint is filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anita M. Boor on 5/20/2024. (voc)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Group Health Cooperative of South Central Wisconsin answer due 6/17/2024. (voc) |
| Filing 5 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, by Defendant Group Health Cooperative of South Central Wisconsin. (Harris, Jacob) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the parties may have until June 10, 2024, to address each of the issues raised in this order or show cause why they are unable to do so. If necessary, the court will set briefing schedules on any motions when they are filed. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 5/15/2024. (voc)
|
| Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by Jacob B. Harris for Defendant Group Health Cooperative of South Central Wisconsin. (Harris, Jacob) |
| Standard attachments for Judge James D. Peterson: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (lak) |
| Case directly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson and Magistrate Judge Anita M. Boor. Related cases: 24cv310, 24cv312, 24cv313, 24cv314, 24cv315, and 24cv317. (lak) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Group Health Cooperative of South Central Wisconsin. (Heneghan, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Dane County Circuit Court, case number 2024CV001197. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AWIWDC-3424394), filed by Group Health Cooperative of South Central Wisconsin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B-Case Details in Dane County Circuit Court, #3 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet) (Heneghan, Thomas) Modified on 5/13/2024. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
