M J Nichols Company, Inc. et al v. Thompson, Craig
| M J Nichols Company, Inc. and Michael J. Nichols |
| Craig Thompson |
| 3:2024cv00566 |
| August 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Anita M Boor |
| William M Conley |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Notice of Appearance filed by Nathalie E. Burmeister for Plaintiffs M J Nichols Company, Inc., Michael J. Nichols. (Burmeister, Nathalie) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Craig Thompson. (lak) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff M J Nichols Company, Inc. (lak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Craig Thompson, ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AWIWDC-3472393.), filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Criteria for objectionable or misleading personalized plates, #2 Exhibit B - List of objectionable registration plates, #3 Summons, #4 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Disregard) (Vebber, Lucas) Modified on 8/12/2024: Deleted addresses of all parties. Deleted duplicate defendant from database. (lak) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley and Magistrate Judge Anita M. Boor. (lak) |
| Standard attachments for Judge William M. Conley required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
