Davis, Zahmall v. Smith & Wesson et al
Zahmall Z. Davis |
John Doe 1, Smith & Wesson, John Doe 8, John Doe 3, John Doe 6, John Doe 7, John Doe 10, John Doe 4, Deputy Mendoza, John Doe 5, Sheriff Kalvin Barrett, Madison Fire Department, Sgt. Roper, John Doe 2, Dane County Sheriff and John Doe 9 |
3:2024cv00642 |
September 11, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Madison Office |
Anita Marie Boor |
James D Peterson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Warden PLRA Letter. (lam),(ps) |
Partial Filing fee received: $20.00, receipt number 3414. (lam),(ps) |
Filing 5 Motion for Extension of Time by Plaintiff Zahmall Z. Davis. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (lam),(ps) |
Filing 4 ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 13.73 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 10/3/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew R. Wiseman on 9/11/2024. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Plaintiff Zahmall Z. Davis. (jef),(ps) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/11/2024: #1 IPP Calculation) (jef). |
Filing 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Zahmall Z. Davis. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Zahmall Z. Davis. (Case randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson.) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jef),(ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.