Cowins, Courtney v. Sundstrom, Jeanette et al
| Courtney M. Cowins |
| Jeanette Sundstrom and Judge Chris Taylor |
| 3:2025cv00532 |
| June 24, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Anita Marie Boor |
| William M Conley |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Warden PLRA Letter. (lam),(ps) |
| Filing 7 Letter from Courtney Cowins regarding Delayed Processing of Disbursement Request (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (lam),(ps) |
| Filing 6 Letter requesting to correct defendant's name spelling in case caption by Plaintiff Courtney M. Cowins. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (lam),(ps) |
| Partial Filing fee received: $15.47, receipt number 4810. (lam),(ps) |
Filing 4
ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $15.47 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 7/25/2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew R. Wiseman on 6/25/2025. (jls),(ps)
|
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Plaintiff Courtney M. Cowins. (jls),(ps) |
| Filing 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Courtney M. Cowins. (jls),(ps) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Courtney M. Cowins. (Case randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley.) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter and Envelope) (jls),(ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
