Davis, Stephen v. Kallas, Kevin et al
| Stephen Matthew Davis |
| Kevin Kallas, Greg Van Rybroek, Dawn Schott, Dr. Mitchell Illichman, John/Jane Doe, James Greer, Dr. David Burnett, Cathy Jess, Brian Pfitzinger and John/Jane Does |
| 3:2026cv00537 |
| June 9, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Anita Marie Boor |
| William M Conley |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 5.84 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 7/2/2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew R. Wiseman on 6/11/2026. (jef),(ps)
|
| Filing 3 Resident Account Statement by Plaintiff Stephen Matthew Davis. (jef),(ps) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/11/2026: #1 IPP Calculation) (jef). |
| Filing 2 Declaration / Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Stephen Matthew Davis. (jef),(ps) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Stephen Matthew Davis. (Case non-randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Order, 22cf340, #2 Exhibit B - DAI 500.70.22 Health Services Dual Commitment Placement, #3 Envelope) (jef),(ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
