Fletcher v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
Jeremy Nathaniel Fletcher |
Social Security Administration Commissioner and Andrew Saul |
0:2021cv00059 |
March 25, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Wyoming |
Nancy D Freudenthal |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jeremy Nathaniel Fletcher. Social Security Administration Commissioner served on 4/26/2021, answer due on 6/25/2021. Served through the United States Attorney, Office of Regional Chief Counsel, U.S. Attorney General. (Wicklund, Edward) |
Filing 5 ORDER by the Honorable Nancy D Freudenthal granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Court Staff, sal) |
Filing 4 Three Summons Issued - Main Attachment - Issued Summons (USAO) (Attachments: #1 Issued Summons (A. Saul), #2 Issued Summons (USAG)) (Court Staff, szf) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Plaintiff Jeremy Nathaniel Fletcher. (Court Staff, szf) |
Filing 2 Notice of Judge Assignment. The case has been assigned to the Honorable Nancy D. Freudenthal. (Court Staff, szf) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Petition for Judicial Review (summons(es) issued)., filed by Jeremy Nathaniel Fletcher. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Court Staff, szf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wyoming District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.