Cotney v. Wyoming Honor Conservation Camp & Boot Camp Case Manager et al
| Phillip DeWayne Cotney |
| Wyoming Honor Conservation Camp & Boot Camp Case Manager, Wyoming Honor Conservation Camp & Boot Camp Correctional Officer Powers, Aimee Simmons, Kristie Butler, Sergeant Powers, Wyoming Department of Corrections Honor Conservation Camp Case Manager Simmons, Wyoming Department of Corrections Honor Conservation Camp Case Manager Butler and Wyoming Department of Corrections Honor Conservation Camp Correctional Officer |
| 0:2021cv00175 |
| September 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Wyoming |
| Kelly H Rankin |
| Scott W Skavdahl |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER ON SCREENING OF PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT by the Honorable Scott W Skavdahl. ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion to proceed informa pauperis is DENIED and his Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (cc: Plaintiff via U.S. Mail) (Court Staff, stbd)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Plaintiff Phillip DeWayne Cotney. (Court Staff, stbd) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER Civil Rights Complaint ( Filing fee not paid IFP Pending.), filed by Phillip DeWayne Cotney. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Envelope) (Court Staff, stbd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wyoming District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
