Van Brunt v. Sweetwater County Circuit Court Judge et al
Derek Van Brunt |
Sweetwater County Sheriff Department Deputy Powell, Sweetwater County Sheriff Lowell, Sweetwater County Circuit Court Judge Jones, Wyoming Department of Transportation, Wyoming Department of Transportation Representative Panos, Sweetwater County Circuit Court Judge, Wyoming Department of Transportation Representative, Sweetwater County Sheriff and Sweetwater County Sheriff Department Deputy |
1:2018cv00156 |
September 25, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Wyoming |
Kelly H Rankin |
Scott W Skavdahl |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER by the Honorable Scott W Skavdahl denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and Dismissing Action. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is DENIED; it is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims against all named Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Copy of Order sent to Plaintiff on this date via U.S. mail.)(Court Staff, skb) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Plaintiff Derek Van Brunt. (Court Staff, skb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (4 summonses issued) with Jury Demand ( Filing fee not paid - IFP pending), filed by Derek Van Brunt. (Court Staff, skb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/25/2018: #1 Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge) (Court Staff, skb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wyoming District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.