Nayeem et al v Segal
Plaintiff: Gouhar Nayeem, Zaynab Rizvi, Mahdi Rizvi, Gouhar Nayeem YR and Gouhar Nayeem HR
Defendant: Oliver Davis Segal
Case Number: 1:2024cv00013
Filed: January 17, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Wyoming
Presiding Judge: Kelly H Rankin
Referring Judge: Scott W Skavdahl
2 Judge: Kelly H Rankin - DO NOT USE
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 6, 2024 Filing 8 (TEXT-ONLY) ORDER by the Honorable Kelly H Rankin granting #7 Motion to Continue (Non-Dispositive). The Court finds that the motion violates the requirements of Local Rule 10.1 and that counsel shall adhere to that rule for all future filings. IT IS ORDERED that the Initial Pretrial Conference is rescheduled for April 3, 2024 at 11:00 AM. All parties shall appear by telephone through the Court's conference call system. Guests call: 307-735-3644 Conference ID: 275 440 149#. Parties should have their calendars on hand for scheduling. Under Local Rule 16.1(a)(2) the parties are reminded to file a written Joint Case Management Plan three business days prior to the Initial Pretrial Scheduling Conference. The Plan form may be located at www.wyd.uscourts.gov/judges-info under Judge Rankin. Initial Pretrial Conference reset for 4/3/2024 at 11:00 AM before Honorable Kelly H Rankin.(Court Staff, smxb)
March 5, 2024 Filing 7 MOTION REFERRED TO Judge Kelly H Rankin. MOTION to Continue (Non-Dispositive). Requesting continuance of Initial Pretrial Conference filed by Defendant Oliver Davis Segal. (Tilton, Kathleen)
February 21, 2024 Filing 6 (TEXT-ONLY) NOTICE of Initial Pretrial Conference: BY TELEPHONE - All parties shall appear by telephone through the Court's conference call system. Guests call: 307-735-3644 Conference ID: 275 440 149#. Parties should have their calendars on hand for scheduling. Under Local Rule 16.1(a)(2) the parties are reminded to file a written Joint Case Management Plan three business days prior to the Initial Pretrial Scheduling Conference. The Plan form may be located at www.wyd.uscourts.gov/judges-info under Judge Rankin. Initial Pretrial Conference set for 4/3/2024 at 09:00 AM before Honorable Kelly H Rankin. (Court Staff, smxb)
February 20, 2024 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses, with Jury Demand by Oliver Davis Segal. (Tilton, Kathleen)
January 30, 2024 Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Mahdi Rizvi, Gouhar Nayeem, Zaynab Rizvi, Gouhar Nayeem HR, Gouhar Nayeem YR. Oliver Davis Segal 1/29/2024, answer due 3/29/2024 (Godfrey, Brett)
January 26, 2024 Notice of Civil Case Filing Fee Payment. $405 Filing Fee was paid with Receipt Number:2-2615.(Court Staff, stmo)
January 25, 2024 Filing 3 (TEXT-ONLY) Notice of Failure to Pay Filing Fee. Filing Fee Due: 1/26/2024 (Court Staff, semt)
January 17, 2024 Filing 2 (1)Summons Issued. (Court Staff, stbd)
January 17, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (1 summons(es) issued) with Jury Demand. Counsel - payment is due within three calendar days. To pay the filing fee with a credit card, please use the event Notice of Civil Filing Fee in CM/ECF or send a check to the Clerk of US District Court, 2120 Capitol Avenue Room 2131, Cheyenne, WY 82001, filed by the Plaintiffs. (Court Staff, stbd) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/17/2024: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Consent) (Court Staff, stbd).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wyoming District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nayeem et al v Segal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gouhar Nayeem
Represented By: Brett Marshall Godfrey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zaynab Rizvi
Represented By: Brett Marshall Godfrey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mahdi Rizvi
Represented By: Brett Marshall Godfrey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gouhar Nayeem YR
Represented By: Brett Marshall Godfrey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gouhar Nayeem HR
Represented By: Brett Marshall Godfrey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oliver Davis Segal
Represented By: Kathleen Tilton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?