Smothers v. Solvay Chemicals Inc

Smothers v. Solvay Chemicals Inc

Plaintiff:	Steven Smothers
Defendant:	Solvay Chemicals Inc
Case Number:	2:2011cv00200
Filed:	May 26, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the District of Wyoming
Office:	Cheyenne Office
County:	Sweetwater
Presiding Judge:	Nancy D Freudenthal
Presiding Judge:	Scott W Skavdahl
Nature of Suit:	Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 3, 2014	Filing 64 ORDER by the Honorable Nancy D Freudenthal reserving ruling on 54 Motion in Limine, regarding the introduction of the four-step disciplinary process until more is known regarding the context if/when such evidence comes in at trial. The Court d enies Defendant's motion regarding the exclusion of Plaintiff's expert witnesses, but will allow Plaintiff to provide the requisite summary of the facts and opinions no later than July 7, 2014 at 5:00 p.m. With respect to Plaintiff's motion, the Court concludes it is granted; denying 55 Motion in Limine regarding the testimony of Plaintiff's treating physicians. Plaintiff shall provided Defendant with a summary of his experts' facts and opinions in accordance with t he Initial Pretrial Order no later than July 7, 2014, at 5:00 p.m. or his experts' testimony will be limited to testifying about their personal knowledge and treatment of Plaintiff, and not on matters concerning future prognosis; granting 56 Motion in Limine.(Court Staff, sdl)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 3, 2014

Filing 64 ORDER by the Honorable Nancy D Freudenthal reserving ruling on 54 Motion in Limine, regarding the introduction of the four-step disciplinary process until more is known regarding the context if/when such evidence comes in at trial. The Court d enies Defendant's motion regarding the exclusion of Plaintiff's expert witnesses, but will allow Plaintiff to provide the requisite summary of the facts and opinions no later than July 7, 2014 at 5:00 p.m. With respect to Plaintiff's motion, the Court concludes it is granted; denying 55 Motion in Limine regarding the testimony of Plaintiff's treating physicians. Plaintiff shall provided Defendant with a summary of his experts' facts and opinions in accordance with t he Initial Pretrial Order no later than July 7, 2014, at 5:00 p.m. or his experts' testimony will be limited to testifying about their personal knowledge and treatment of Plaintiff, and not on matters concerning future prognosis; granting 56 Motion in Limine.(Court Staff, sdl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wyoming District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smothers v. Solvay Chemicals Inc
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven Smothers
Represented By:	Sharon M Rose
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Solvay Chemicals Inc
Represented By:	Paul J Hickey
Represented By:	Kristi Marie Radosevich
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?