Martin v. Strayhan et al
Becky Martin |
Rob Shebor, Dr Lonz and Amy Strayhan |
2:2018cv00128 |
August 8, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Wyoming |
Cheyenne Office |
Laramie |
Kelly H Rankin |
Scott W Skavdahl |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION by the Honorable Scott W Skavdahl denying #5 Motion for Reconsideration. (cc: Pro Se Plaintiff via USPS)(Court Staff, stbd) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Reconsideration re #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Petitioner Becky Martin. (Court Staff, sth) |
Filing 4 ORDER by the Honorable Scott W Skavdahl denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and Dismissing Complaint without Prejudice.(cc: Pro Se Plaintiff via USPS)(Court Staff, stbd) |
Filing 3 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Honorable Scott W Skavdahl for all further proceedings; Honorable Kelly H Rankin no longer assigned to caseby the Honorable Scott W Skavdahl.(Copy of order mailed to plaintiff) (Court Staff, ssw) Filed date Modified on 8/9/2018 (Court Staff, ssw). |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Petitioner Becky Martin. (Court Staff, ssw) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Becky Martin. (Court Staff, ssw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wyoming District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.