Woods v. Wyoming Attorney General
Clinton Ray Woods |
Wyoming Attorney General and Peter K Michael |
2:2019cv00094 |
May 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Wyoming |
Kelly H Rankin |
Scott W Skavdahl |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER by the Honorable Scott W Skavdahl granting #3 Motion to Stay Case. This case is STAYED pending exhaustion of state remedies, conditioned upon Petitioner commencing sttre court exhaustion proceedings within 60 days of this order and returning to this Court within 60 days of completing such exhaustion.(Court Staff, scat) |
Filing 4 ORDER Granting #2 Motion to Appear pro hac vice admitting Clifford J Barnard for Clinton Ray Woods by the Honorable Kelly H. Rankin (Court Staff, szf) |
Filing 3 EX-PARTE DOCUMENT - MOTION to stay case pending exhaustion of state remedies, etc filed by Petitioner Clinton Ray Woods, Respondent Wyoming Attorney General. (Moxley, Robert) Modified restriction on 5/21/2019 (Court Staff, scat). |
Filing 2 MOTION REFERRED TO Judge Kelly H Rankin. MOTION for Cliffard J. Barnard to appear pro hac vice; Check tendered - Receipt CHY030898; filed by Petitioner Clinton Ray Woods. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Proposed Order)(Court Staff, ssw) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) ( Filing fee $5 receipt #CHY030898.), filed by Clinton Ray Woods. (Court Staff, ssw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wyoming District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.