Toth v. Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Warden
Gregory Toth |
Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Warden and Eddie Wilson |
2:2020cv00056 |
April 1, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Wyoming |
Kelly H Rankin |
Scott W Skavdahl |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Warden. Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Warden 4/16/2020, answer due 6/15/2020 (Craig, Jenny) |
Filing 3 WAIVER of Service Issued for WYDOC Medium Correctional Institution Warden on 4/15/2020. Waiver of Service due by 5/15/2020. (cc: WYAG via email on this date.) (Court Staff, skb) Modified on 5/12/2020 (Court Staff, skb). |
Filing 2 ORDER Requiring Service of Complaint by Clerk of Court and Requiring Responseby the Honorable Scott W Skavdahl. (cc: WYAG via email.)(Court Staff, skb) Modified on 4/15/2020 (Court Staff, skb). |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2241 (Filing fee $5.), filed by Gregory Toth. (Attachments: #1 cover letter, #2 envelope) (Court Staff, sjlg) |
FINANCIAL ENTRY - $5 filing fee received on this date (receipt #CHY032787). (Court Staff, sal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wyoming District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.