Terpin et al v. Cooner et al
| MICHAEL TERPIN and ITMO US Inc Director |
| JASON COONER, ITMO US, INC., ITMO US Inc Director and Officer and ITMO US Inc |
| 2:2022cv00159 |
| July 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Wyoming |
| Alan B Johnson |
| Kelly H Rankin |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 REPLY to #15 Response in Opposition to Motion re #11 Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant ITMO US Inc. (Hutchins, Clyde) Modified links on 9/13/2022 (Court Staff, sbh). |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Plaintiffs ITMO US Inc Director, Michael Terpin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Attachment A) (Nicholas, Nathan) |
Filing 14
ORDER by the Honorable Kelly H Rankin granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff shall have up to and including September 6, 2022, within which to respond to Defendant ITMO US, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss. (Court Staff, sag)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION REFERRED TO Judge Kelly H Rankin. MOTION for Extension of Time (Non-Dispositive) requesting extension of Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Deadline filed by Plaintiffs ITMO US Inc Director, Michael Terpin. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Nicholas, Nathan) |
| Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Support of #11 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction and Failure to State a Claim filed by Defendant ITMO US Inc. (Hutchins, Clyde) Modified on 8/11/2022 (Court Staff, sbh). |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Failure to State a Claim filed by Defendant ITMO US Inc. (Hutchins, Clyde) |
| Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE filed by ITMO US Inc. (Hutchins, Clyde) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Clyde William Hutchins, Jr on behalf of ITMO US Inc (Hutchins, Clyde) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael Terpin, ITMO US Inc Director. ITMO US INC served on 7/22/2022, answer due on 8/12/2022 (Nicholas, Nathan) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of complexity by Plaintiffs ITMO US Inc Director, Michael Terpin: this case is non-complex. (Nicholas, Nathan) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Judge Assignment and Consent to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge. The case has been assigned to the Honorable Alan B. Johnson (presiding) and the Honorable Kelly H. Rankin (referral). (Court Staff, sal) |
| Filing 5 Summonses (2) Issued. (Court Staff, sal) |
| Filing 4 Praecipe for Summonses filed by Plaintiff Michael Terpin (Nicholas, Nathan) (Additional attachment(s) added and language modified on 7/22/2022: #2 Summons - Cooner, #3 Summons - ITMO) (Court Staff, sal). |
| Filing 3 FILED INCORRECTLY - see [1-1] NOTICE by Plaintiff MICHAEL TERPIN re #1 Complaint (Attorney) Civil Cover Sheet (Nicholas, Nathan) Modified on 7/22/2022 (Court Staff, sal). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Nathan A Nicholas on behalf of Michael Terpin, ITMO US Inc. (Nicholas, Nathan) (Main Document 2 replaced to flatten and language modified on 7/22/2022) (Court Staff, sal). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Jason Cooner, ITMO US Inc, ITMO US Inc Director and Officer filed by Michael Terpin, ITMO US Inc Director. (Filing fee $ 402, Receipt Number AWYDC-2130411) (Nicholas, Nathan) (Attachment added and language modified on 7/22/2022: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Court Staff, sal). Modified text on 7/22/2022 (Court Staff, stmo). Modified text on 7/25/2022 (Court Staff, sbh). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wyoming District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
