Brunner v. Wyoming Department of Corrections et al
Donald Earl Brunner |
Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections and Daniel Shannon |
2:2022cv00174 |
August 5, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Wyoming |
Alan B Johnson |
Kelly H Rankin |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state detainer) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 FINAL JUDGMENT by the Honorable Alan B. Johnson. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this matter is DISMISSED. Case closed. (Judgment emailed to petitioner on this date) (Court Staff, sbh) |
Filing 13 ORDER by the Honorable Alan B. Johnson dismissing #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, denying #12 Motion to Appoint Counsel, denying as moot #6 Motion for Order to get Telephone Records; denying as moot #7 Motion for Order on Amendment XIV 1 and Predeprivation Procedures; denying as moot #8 Motion for Order to Produce Recordings and Records. The Petition is dismissed for abuse of the writ. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED a certificate of appealability SHALL NOT ISSUE. (Order emailed to petitioner on this date) (Court Staff, sbh) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Petitioner Donald Earl Brunner (Court Staff, sbh) |
Filing 11 Letter regarding Violation of Constitutional Rights of Due Process from Petitioner Donald Earl Brunner (Court Staff, sbh) |
Filing 10 Letter regarding Inmate Communication Form on 367 days not credited from Petitioner Donald Earl Brunner (Court Staff, sbh) |
Filing 9 ORDER ON INITIAL SCREENING re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by the Honorable Alan B. Johnson. The Court finds Mr. Brunner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is a successive writ under the abuse of the writ doctrine. Mr. Brunner shall have 14 days to file an objection. If Mr. Brunner fails to file an objection, the Court will issue an order dismissing the case. (Order emailed to petitioner on this date) (Court Staff, sbh) |
Filing 8 MOTION REFERRED TO Judge Kelly H Rankin. MOTION for Order to Produce Audio Recording, Records of Disciplinary Hearing for Escape and All Procedures filed by Petitioner Donald Earl Brunner. (Court Staff, sbh) |
Filing 7 MOTION REFERRED TO Judge Kelly H Rankin. MOTION for Order on Amendment XIV 1 and Predeprivation Procedures filed by Petitioner Donald Earl Brunner. (Court Staff, sbh) |
Filing 6 MOTION REFERRED TO Judge Kelly H Rankin. MOTION for Order to Get Telephone Records filed by Petitioner Donald Earl Brunner. (Court Staff, sbh) |
Filing 5 Letter regarding Due Process of Law Required in Disciplinary Hearings from Petitioner Donald Earl Brunner (Court Staff, sbh) |
FINANCIAL ENTRY: $5.00 Paid, Receipt 2-199. (Court Staff, stmo) |
Filing 4 Letter regarding Respondents' Memorandum to Support Motion to Dismiss Writ of Heabeas Corpus under 2254 from Petitioner Donald Earl Brunner (Court Staff, sbh) |
Filing 3 BRIEF regarding Problems with WDOC ACC Code of Conduct filed by Petitioner Donald Earl Brunner (Court Staff, sbh) |
Filing 2 NOTICE Regarding Wyoming Statutes 7-3-401, 7-3-408, 7-13-1801, 7-13-1802, 7-13-1803, Defintions, Adult Community Correction Sanction and Revocation Hearing Procedures, Duties of the Department of Corrections, Authorized Sanctions, Procedures for Imposing Sanctions by Petitioner Donald Earl Brunner (Court Staff, szf) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Donald Earl Brunner. (Court Staff, sjlg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wyoming District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.