Cases 61 - 70 of 277,876
Gutierrez, et al. v. California Department of Justice, et al.
as 24-3558
Plaintiff:
JOHN-MICHAEL GUTIERREZ and JMCG SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Alexandre, et al. v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al.
as 24-3566
Plaintiff:
LUCIANO ALEXANDRE, on behalf of themselves, and all others similarly situated, CHRISTINE LOUISE JOHNSON, on behalf of themselves, and all others similarly situated, ERIC NELSON, on behalf of themselves, and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC. and DOES 1-10
Sneed, et al. v. Talphera, Inc., et al.
as 24-3560
Plaintiff:
AARON SNEED, JR., YAACOV MUSRY and DAVID O'GRADY
Defendant:
TALPHERA, INC., formerly known as: AcelRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc., VINCENT J. ANGOTTI and PAMELA P. PALMER
Mikulsky v. Bloomingdale's, LLC, et al.
as 24-3564
Plaintiff:
ERICA MIKULSKY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
BLOOMINGDALE'S, LLC and BLOOMINGDALES.COM, LLC
Urias v. Garland
as 24-3555
Petitioner:
ROBERTO CARLOS URIAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Medrano-Villalobos, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3554
Petitioner:
RUTH MARLENE MEDRANO-VILLALOBOS and BRYAN ANTONIO ROSA-MEDRANO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Turner v. Weston, et al.
as 24-3563
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY R. TURNER and Anthony Richardo Turner
Defendant:
W. WESTON, A. CAMPIN, C. BIRCH and others
Mahon v. Apple Inc., et al.
as 24-3571
Plaintiff:
MARK MAHON
Defendant:
APPLE INC., ITUNES STORE and APPLE DISTRIBUTION INTERNATIONAL, LTD.
Barbosa da Costa Araujo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3552
Petitioner:
ELIANE BARBOSA DA COSTA ARAUJO, DOMINICK COSTA ARAUJO and ANTHONY COSTA ARAUJO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mahon v. YouTube, LLC, et al.
as 24-3570
Plaintiff:
MARK MAHON
Defendant:
YOUTUBE, LLC and GOOGLE LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
