Cases 41 - 50 of 826
Eduardo Gonzalez v. Verfruco Foods, Inc.
as 23-13704
Petitioner:
EDUARDO GONZALEZ
Respondent:
VERFRUCO FOODS, INC.
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Daryl Sharp v. Timothy Dolan, et al
as 23-13685
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARYL SHARP
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY DOLAN, TIMOTHY BROGLIO and US CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS
Timothy Burke v. USA
as 23-13649
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMOTHY BURKE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Bock Holdings, LLC, et al v. Republic of Honduras, et al
as 23-13552
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BOCK HOLDINGS, LLC, CINDY MILLER, GARY MILLER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
REPUBLIC OF HONDURAS and NATIONAL AGRARIAN INSTITUTE OF HONDURAS
In re: James Esseks, et al
as 23-13524
Appellant:
In re: JAMES D. ESSEKS, CARL S. CHARLES, LATISHA GOTELL FAULKS and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Melody Eagan, et alIn re: Melody Eagan, et al
as 23-13527
Appellant:
In re: MELODY H. EAGAN and JEFFREY P. DOSS
T & B Holding Group, LLC v. U.S. Attorney General, et al
as 23-13385
Plaintiff / Appellant:
T & B HOLDING GROUP, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DIRECTOR, U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS) and others
Scoma Chiropractic, P.A. v. National Spine and Pain Centers LLC, et al
as 23-13269
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SCOMA CHIROPRACTIC, P.A.
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
NATIONAL SPINE AND PAIN CENTERS LLC and PAIN MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, P.L.
Antonio Caballero v. Raul Belisario, et al
as 23-13180
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANTONIO CABALLERO
Interested Party:
RAUL GORRIN BELISARIO, GUSTAVO PERDOMO ROSALES, GLOBOVISION TELE C.A. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MAGUS HOLDING LLC and TINDAYA PROPERTIES OF NEW YORK II CORP
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
