Cases 41 - 50 of 23,012
Marin v. Magical Cruise Company, Limited
as 6:2024cv01049
Plaintiff:
Elmer Marin
Defendant:
Magical Cruise Company, Limited doing business as Disney Cruise Line
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Lacambra v. TForce Freight, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Leopoldo C Lacambra, Jr.
Defendant:
TForce Freight, Inc. and PLANT BASED PROS
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706 Liability of Carriers Under Receipts and Bills of Lading
Cummings v. Farah & Farah, P.A.
as 3:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
Willie C. Cummings
Defendant:
Farah & Farah, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hillbery v. Nu Skin Enterprises United States, Inc. et al
as 8:2024mc00012
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Hillbery
Defendant:
Nu Skin Enterprises United States, Inc. and Skin International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963 Registration of judgment from another district
American Securities Association v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
as 8:2024cv01377
Plaintiff:
American Securities Association
Defendant:
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552 Freedom of Information Act
Tom v. Thomas Roofing and Repair Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv01037
Plaintiff:
David Tom
Defendant:
Thomas Roofing and Repair Inc. and Pinnacle Marketing Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
