Cases 51 - 60 of 138,100
Toussaint Holdings, LLC v. Hooker
as 1:2024mc22384
Plaintiff:
Toussaint Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Michael R Hooker
Clark et al v. Everbank, N.A. et al
as 3:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Melanie Clark and Shawn Clark
Defendant:
Everbank, N.A. and Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Moon v. Florida Home-Improvement Associates, Inc.
as 0:2024cv61062
Plaintiff:
Marion Alexis Moon
Defendant:
Florida Home-Improvement Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Moon v. Florida Home-Improvement Associates, Inc.
as 0:2024cv61063
Plaintiff:
Marion Alexis Moon
Defendant:
Florida Home-Improvement Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Faranaz Lalbiharie
as 1:2024cv22367
Plaintiff:
Applicant Rachel Ester Faranaz Lalbiharie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Faranaz Lalbiharie v. CITIBANK N.A.
as 1:2024cv22368
Plaintiff:
Applicant Rachel Ester Faranaz Lalbiharie
Defendant:
CITIBANK N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
In Re: APPLICATION OF RACHEL ESTER FARANAZ LALBIHARIE FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1782
as 1:2024mc22368
Not Yet Classified:
Rachel Ester Faranaz Lalbiharie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
