Other Statutory Actions Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 61 - 70 of 9,866
SHEIKHBAHAEI v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2024cv00793
Plaintiff: ALI MATTHEW SHEIKHBAHAEI
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. EMBASSY IN ABU DHABI, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES, ANTONY BLINKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
QATAR NATIONAL BANK et al
as 1:2024mc00035
Petitioner: QATAR NATIONAL BANK and QATAR CHARITY
Respondent: PERLES LAW FIRM, P.C.
PERNELL v. BROWN
as 1:2024mc00043
Petitioner: LEROY PERNELL
Respondent: BRANDY BROWN
SAMPSON v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
as 1:2024cv00729
Plaintiff: JERMAINE C. SAMPSON, SR.
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PETWAY v. TRANSUNION
as 1:2024cv00711
Plaintiff: JACQULINE PETWAY
Defendant: TRANSUNION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. OFFICE DEPOT, INC.
as 1:2024mc00034
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent: OFFICE DEPOT, INC.
BEIKZADEH v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2024cv00519
Plaintiff: HOSSEIN BEIKZADEH
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. CONSULATE GENERAL TORONTO, ANTONY J. BLINKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. v. ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. et al
as 1:2024mc00050
Petitioner: LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.
Respondent: ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. and ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL
DIEGELMANN et al v. YELLIN et al
as 1:2024cv01090
Plaintiff: AXEL DIEGELMANN, FRITZ DIEGELMANN, RHEINGOLD EDELMETALL AG and others
Defendant: JANET YELLIN, BRADLEY SMITH, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. v. ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. et al
as 1:2024mc00049
Petitioner: LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.
Respondent: ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. and ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?