Cases 81 - 90 of 228
SIVANADIYAN v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2021cv01950
Petitioner:
PARVATHI SIVANADIYAN
Interested Party:
VISHAL KALYANI
Respondent:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
MORRILL et al v. NELSON
as 1:2021cv01877
Plaintiff:
RODNEY MORRILL, NANCY CHURCH, KATHY NORGARD and others
Defendant:
BRETT ANDREW NELSON
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
ELIAS v. NELSON
as 1:2021cv01879
Plaintiff:
ROSANA FONSECA ELIAS
Defendant:
BRETT ANDREW NELSON
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
STATE OF COLORADO v. NELSON
as 1:2021cv01882
Plaintiff:
STATE OF COLORADO
Defendant:
BRETT ANDREW NELSON
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
NELSON v. PLOTZ et al
as 1:2021cv01855
Petitioner:
BRETT ANDREW NELSON
Respondent:
KENNETH MURRAY PLOTZ, DAVID WAITE, KAREN BLISS and others
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
NELSON v. WALZL
as 1:2021cv01169
Plaintiff:
BRETT ANDREW NELSON and BRETT-ANDREW
Defendant:
DANIEL AUSTIN WALZL
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
NELSON v. BURGEMEISTER et al
as 1:2021cv01168
Plaintiff:
BRETT ANDREW NELSON and BRETT-ANDREW
Defendant:
ASHLEY MORGAN BURGEMEISTER, LORI BETH TALBOT, KERI ANN YODER and others
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
NELSON v. BECKENHAUER et al
as 1:2021cv01484
Defendant:
JESSICA WAGGONER, JOSHUA DOUGHERTY, KURT BECKENHAUER and others
Plaintiff:
BRETT ANDREW NELSON
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
FRAZER SOLAR GMBH v. KINGDOM OF LESOTHO
as 1:2021cv01351
Petitioner:
FRAZER SOLAR GMBH
Respondent:
THE KINGDOM OF LESOTHO, c/o the Office of the Prime Minister Government Office Complex, Phase 1 Qhobosheaneng, Maseru 100 Kingdom of Lesotho and KINGDOM OF LESOTHO
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0202
CAIRN ENERGY PLC et al v. REPUBLIC OF INDIA
as 1:2021cv00396
Respondent:
THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA and REPUBLIC OF INDIA
Petitioner:
CAIRN ENERGY PLC and CAIRN UK HOLDINGS LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0202
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
