Cases 111 - 120 of 35,466
INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK v. CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION et al
as 1:2024cv01618
Plaintiff:
INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK
Defendant:
CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK v. CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION et al
as 1:2024cv01620
Plaintiff:
INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK
Defendant:
CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK v. CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION et al
as 1:2024cv01621
Plaintiff:
INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK
Defendant:
CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
STRESHINSKIY et al v. SMITH et al
as 1:2024cv01601
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Yakovlevich Streshinskiy and Natalia Alexevvna Streshinskaya
Defendant:
BRADLEY T. SMITH and U.S. Treasury Dept., OFAC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
CELEY v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
as 1:2024cv01602
Plaintiff:
TYRONE CELEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
ACA Connects - America's Communications Associatio v. FCC, et al
as 24-1169
Petitioner:
ACA Connects - America's Communications Association
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
USA v. Christopher Quaglin
as 24-3074
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Christopher Joseph Quaglin
Friends of Animals v. United States Bureau of Land Management, et al
as 24-5149
Plaintiff:
Friends of Animals
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Land Management, an agency of the United States
Intervenor:
State of Utah
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
