Cases 91 - 100 of 749
Kent Allen, Jr. v. William Wang, et al
as 22-7106
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kent Allen, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
William Wang, CEO and Kent Allen
GARCIA v. RUBIN GROUP LLC et al
as 1:2022cv02119
Plaintiff:
KARL GARCIA
Defendant:
RUBIN GROUP LLC, 819D LLC, 819 CAPITAL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)
KIFLE et al v. ZP TOWING
as 1:2022cv02056
Plaintiff:
Kidane Kifle, KNT Signs & Graphics, LLC and KNT SIGNS & GRAPHICS LLC
Defendant:
ZP Towing, Inc. and ZP TOWING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION v. TESMEC USA, INC.
as 1:2022cv01893
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Defendant:
TESMEC USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Kent Allen, Jr. v. Andy Jassey, et al
as 22-7090
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kent Allen, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Andy Jassey, CEO of Amazon and Kent Allen
Kent Allen, Jr. v. Daniel Ek, et al
as 22-7089
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kent Allen, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Daniel Ek, CEO of Spotify, Kiari Cephus and Kent Allen
LANG et al v. THARPE et al
as 1:2022cv01557
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LANG and SUSANNE LANG
Defendant:
DONALD R. THARPE, DONALD R. THARPE TRUST, PETER COLASANTE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
ALLEN v. EK et al
as 1:2022cv01344
Plaintiff:
KENT ALLEN, JR.
Defendant:
DANIEL EK, KIARI CEPHUS and KENT ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ALLEN v. JASSEY et al
as 1:2022cv01351
Plaintiff:
KENT ALLEN, JR.
Defendant:
ANDY JASSEY and KENT ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
GMO FREE USA v. BURT'S BEES, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv01277
Plaintiff:
GMO FREE USA d/b/a TOXIN FREE USA and GMO FREE USA doing business as TOXIN FREE USA
Defendant:
BURT'S BEES, INC., THE CLOROX COMPANY and CLOROX COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
