Cases 1 - 10 of 5,315
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01056
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Artistic Industries, LLC et al v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01044
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc., Wal-Mart.com USA, LLC and The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "1"
Plaintiff:
EZ-Step Mobility, Inc., Longstem Organizers, Inc., Knight Distributing Co. doing business as Regency Cosmetics and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
In Re: Qualcomm Inc.
as 1:2024mc00437
Petitioner:
Qualcomm Inc.
Respondent:
Mr. Gordon MacPherson
Cause Of Action: Miscellaneous Application
Ghader v. The Plan Administrator et al
as 1:2024cv00686
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
In Re: Letter Request from Sao Paulo Brazil
as 1:2024cv01021
Petitioner:
The United States of America
Respondent:
Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Trial Court in Civil Matters No. 92 in Buenos Aires, Argentina v. Bank of America
as 1:2024cv00994
Respondent:
Bank of America
Petitioner:
Trial Court in Civil Matters No. 92 in Buenos Aires, Argentina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Mott, Esq. v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv00850
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Longmore v. Capital One, N.A.
as 1:2024cv00982
Plaintiff:
Spencer Bruce Longmore
Defendant:
Capital One, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
