Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Sunrise Cooperative, Inc. v. AGRI, et al
as 17-3807
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUNRISE COOPERATIVE, INC., An Ohio cooperative association
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, RISK MANAGEMENT AGENCY, an agency of the United States Department of Agriculture and FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE CORPORATION, an agency and body corporate of the United States Department of Agriculture
Charles Fulkerson, et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III, et al
as 17-5874
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES FULKERSON, dba Whittaker Shooting Supply, Inc.
Petitioner:
CINDY FULKERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U.S. Attorney General, THOMAS E. BRANDON, Acting Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and DAVID D. JOHANSEN, Director of Industry Operations Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Stanley Doremus v. Carolyn Colvin
as 17-3647
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY B. DOREMUS
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Ian Murray v. Robert McDonald, et al
as 17-5619
Petitioner - Appellant:
IAN F. MURRAY
Respondent:
SECRETARY ROBERT A. MCDONALD
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID J. SHULKIN, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Whitestone Group, Inc. v. DOE, et al
as 17-3567
Petitioner - Appellant:
WHITESTONE GROUP, INC.
Respondent - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, ERNEST MONIZ and DENISE HUNTER
Nicola Ruhl, et al v. State of OH Health Department, et al
as 17-3420
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NICOLA RUHL, W.R. and GARY RUHL, On His/Her Own Behalf and on Behalf of a Minor, W.R.
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OHIO HEALTH DEPARTMENT, Director and RICHLAND COUNTY BOARD OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, Superintendent
Julian Hood, Jr. v. OPM
as 17-1417
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN R. HOOD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
Julian Hood, Jr. v. Postmaster General
as 17-1400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN R. HOOD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
POSTMASTER GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
