Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 51 - 60 of 97,861
Harper v. Georges, et al.
as 24-3514
Plaintiff: PATRICK ROY HARPER
Defendant: PETER GEORGES, individually and in his official capacity as California Department of Fish and Wildlife, LORI FRUGOLI, individually and in her official capacity as District Attorney County of Marin, MICHAEL WEAR, individually and in his official capacity as Deputy District Attorney County of Marin and others
Anderson v. Allison
as 24-3503
Petitioner: JERRY ANDERSON
Respondent: KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary of Prisons, California Department of Corrections
Perez-Chuello v. Garland
as 24-3508
Petitioner: EYBBER JAVIER PEREZ-CHUELLO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Koklich, et al. v. Borders, et al.
as 24-3505
Plaintiff: BRUCE KOKLICH, individually and as Class Representatives, HAROLD W. TAYLOR, DAVID M. ZIEMKE and others
Defendant: DEAN BORDERS, Warden and Senior Administrative and Policy making Officer, individual and official capacity and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, a California Public Entity
United States of America v. Chee
as 24-3515
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: SAMMIE BICENTI CHEE
Barrientos-Duran v. Garland
as 24-3512
Petitioner: JORGE BARRIENTOS-DURAN
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cox v. Merchant
as 24-3517
Petitioner: ALLAN COX
Respondent: JOHN MERCHANT
United States of America v. Flores
as 24-3519
Defendant: REYES FLORES and Night Owl
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Flores-Vargas v. Garland
as 24-3477
Petitioner: JULIO EDUARDO FLORES-VARGAS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Turner v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
as 24-3464
Plaintiff: ANTHONY R. TURNER and Anthony Richardo Turner
Defendant: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, KEN BROOMFIELD, AREOLA, Sergeant and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?