Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 111 - 120 of 278,154
Gustafson-Feis, et al. v. Mayo, et al.
as 24-3686
Plaintiff: LISA GUSTAFSON-FEIS and JULIEN FEIS
Defendant: KEITH MAYO, Doctor, SWEDISH FIRST HILL, CHRISTOPHER BOONE, Doctor and others
Hernandez v. Russell, et al.
as 24-3672
Plaintiff: FRANK MANUEL HERNANDEZ
Defendant: PERRY RUSSELL, Warden, RON SCHRECKENGOST, Assistant Warden WSCC, BRIANA HILL, Grievance Report/Assistant and others
Hedges v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-3687
Plaintiff: CRAIG JOSEPH HEDGES
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DAVID A. HUBBART, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, DOJ - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Thomas v. County of Deschutes, et al.
as 24-3691
Plaintiff: BRIGITTE THOMAS, as Administrator of the Estate of Bryan Penner
Defendant: COUNTY OF DESCHUTES, a municipal corporation and KAITLYN KITAJI, MSW, LCSW in her individual and official capacity as mental health treatment provider at Deschutes County Adult Jail
United States of America v. Boucher
as 24-3674
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: MARK J. BOUCHER
United States of America v. Contreras-Ramirez
as 24-3677
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: RODRIGO CONTRERAS-RAMIREZ
Villegas-Hernandez v. Garland
as 24-3673
Petitioner: CHRISTIAN VILLEGAS-HERNANDEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Peters v. Guaranteed Rate, Inc., et al.
as 24-3679
Plaintiff: ROBERT PETERS, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated
Defendant: GUARANTEED RATE, INC., VICTOR CIARDELLI and NIKOLAOS ATHANASIOU
Taylor v. Pope
as 24-3678
Plaintiff: JERMEL A. TAYLOR
Defendant: TIMOTHY RAY POPE
Sun Group U.S.A. Harmony City, Inc. v. CRRC Corporation, Ltd.
as 24-3680
Plaintiff: SUN GROUP U.S.A. HARMONY CITY, INC.
Defendant: CRRC CORPORATION, LTD., doing business as China Railway Rolling Stock Corporation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?