Cases 201 - 210 of 38,680
Canadian Flatbeds LTD et al v. Alpizar et al
as 1:2024mc22103
Petitioner:
Canadian Flatbeds LTD and Shamsher Singh
Respondent:
Maria Alpizar and Eduardo Alpizar
Kline v. Royal Caribbean Group
as 1:2024cv21434
Defendant:
ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP and ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES, LTD.
Plaintiff:
LYNN KLINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
De Caso v. MSC Cruises, S.A
as 1:2024cv22105
Plaintiff:
Joseph De Caso
Defendant:
MSC Cruises, S.A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
LAWING v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2024cv22101
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE LAWING
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation d/b/a Carnival Cruise Line
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Perez v. NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD. et al
as 1:2024cv21501
Plaintiff:
Sandra Perez
Defendant:
NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD., Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd., Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. d/b/a NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Canadian Flatbeds LTD et al v. Alpizar et al
as 1:2024cv22097
Petitioner:
Canadian Flatbeds LTD and Shamsher Singh
Respondent:
Maria Alpizar and Eduardo Alpizar
Goldfeder v. Williams,DO et al
as 9:2024cv80407
Plaintiff:
MD Bruce Wayne Goldfeder
Defendant:
Dr Ronald K. Williams,DO, United States, Cory P. Price and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
DEMBINSKI v. NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD.
as 1:2024cv22087
Plaintiff:
ABIGAIL DEMBINSKI
Defendant:
NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
JADUE v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv22106
Plaintiff:
SERGIO JADUE
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., AMAZON STUDIOS, LLC, AMAZON VIDEO BRASIL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Long v. Avila
as 2:2024cv14171
Plaintiff:
Kyle Long
Defendant:
Maria Avila
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
