Cases 71 - 80 of 250
La Liberte v. Reid
as 1:2018cv05398
Plaintiff:
Roslyn La Liberte
Defendant:
Joy Reid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Doe v. Maier et. al.
as 2:2018cv04956
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
Brennan Becker, James Roes 1-25, Gavin Yingling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Yan v. Zhou et al
as 2:2018cv04673
Plaintiff:
Jun Yan
Defendant:
Jie Hu and Libo Zhou
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Melville v. John Does 1-6 et al
as 1:2018cv04260
Defendant:
Police Officers John Does 1-6, Lt. "John" Cain and City of New York
Plaintiff:
Teron Melville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Keane v. John Does 1-6 et al
as 1:2018cv03765
Defendant:
Police Officers John Does 1-6, Lt. "John" Cain and City of New York
Plaintiff:
Cristol Keane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Goldman v. Reddington
as 1:2018cv03662
Plaintiff:
Alex Goldman
Defendant:
Catherine Reddington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wexler v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP et al
as 1:2018cv03066
Plaintiff:
Shimshon Wexler
Defendant:
Dorsey & Whitney, LLP and Artin Betpera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Dodson et al v. International Cricket Council et al
as 1:2018cv02548
Plaintiff:
Linden Dodson and Dainty A. Gladstone
Defendant:
International Cricket Council and David Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Donnelly v. Tinsley et al
as 1:2018cv02452
Plaintiff:
D.J. Donnelly
Defendant:
MY Life.com Inc. and Jeffrey Tinsley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Taylor v. O'Connor et al
as 1:2018cv01476
Plaintiff:
Hugh G Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
The Artist Book Foundation, Inc. and Timothy V. O'Connor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
