Cases 1 - 10 of 3,750
Eliason v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Veronique Eliason
Defendant:
United States of America, Joe Biden, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
State of Utah et al v. Haaland et al
as 4:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
State of Utah, Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration, Wayne County and others
Defendant:
Deb Haaland, Department of Interior, Charles Sams and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Utah et al v. Haaland et al
as 2:2024cv00388
Plaintiff:
State of Utah, Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration, Wayne County and others
Defendant:
Deb Haaland, Department of Interior, Charles Sams and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
AR Design Innovations LLC v. Rove Concepts LTD
as 2:2024mc00386
Plaintiff:
AR Design Innovations LLC
Defendant:
Rove Concepts LTD
Respondent:
Expivi Inc
AR Design Innovations LLC v. Rove Concepts LTD
as 1:2024mc00092
Petitioner:
AR Design Innovations LLC
Respondent:
EXPIVI Inc.
State of Utah et al v. Department of Interior et al
as 4:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
State of Utah and Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration
Defendant:
Department of Interior, Deb Haaland, Bureau of Land Management and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
