Cases 1 - 10 of 717
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kansas Wheat Alliance, Inc. et al v. Riffel et al
as 6:2009cv01121
Plaintiff:
Kansas Wheat Alliance, Inc., Kansas Wheat Alliance, Inc., Kansas State University Research Foundation, The and others
Defendant:
Steve Riffel, Randall E. Riffel, Riffel Farms, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2321 Plant Variety Protection Act
Tucker v. Department of Veterans Affairs
as 6:2009cv01119
Plaintiff:
LaDonna Lynn Tucker
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States of America v. Cannady
as 6:2009mc00105
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Mark C. Cannady
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Type:
Other Statutes
Price v. Vratil et al
as 2:2009cv02198
Plaintiff:
David Martin Price
Defendant:
Kathryn H. Vratil and United States District Court for the District of Kansas
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
