Cases 51 - 60 of 374
SeaBreeze Jetlev, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00170
Petitioner:
SeaBreeze Jetlev, LLC, H2O Sports Hawaii, LLC and SeaBreeze Jet Ski, LLC
In the Matter of: Akua LLC
as 1:2020cv00106
In Re:
In The Matter Of:
Plaintiff:
Akua LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Kline v. Wild Side Specialty Tours, LLC
as 1:2020cv00102
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Kline
Defendant:
Downing Braley and Wild Side Specialty Tours, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Arde v. Island Magic Catamaran, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00001
Defendant:
Doe Associates 1-20, Other Entities 1-20, Stephen Arrant and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Arde
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Kalkman v. Central Gulf Lines, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00676
Defendant:
M/V Green Cove and Central Gulf Lines, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carsten Kalkman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Fish N Dive LLC
as 1:2019cv00604
Plaintiff:
Fish N Dive LLC, Honu Group LLC, Honu Watersports LLC and others
In Re:
In The Matter Of:
Claimant:
Enkhsuvd Batbold, James A. Liotta, Tyler Brown and others
Interested Party:
PADI Americas, Inc. and Padi Worldwide Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Teagle v. Aquazone, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00571
Defendant:
Devon K. Merrifield and Aquazone, LLC
Plaintiff:
Garrett E. Teagle
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
In the Matter Of: Catamaran Holdings, LLC
as 1:2019cv00560
Plaintiff:
Catamaran Holdings, LLC
In Re:
In The Matter Of:
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Sullivan v. American President Lines, Ltd. et al
as 1:2019cv00509
Defendant:
American President Lines, LLC, Doe Government Agencies 1-20, Doe Defendants 1-20 and others
Plaintiff:
William A. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chapman vs. Honu Watersports LLC
as 1:2019cv00462
Defendant:
Doe LLC's 1-10, Doe Government Entities 1-10, John Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Chapman, John Chapman and Susen Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
